Shatrudhan Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit Kr Yadav @ Shatrudhan Kr. v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19622 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2023 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Shatrudhan Kumar @ Rohit Kumar Yadav @ Rohit Kr Yadav @ Shatrudhan Kr. S/o- Dashrath Rai Village-Lakshmipur Jakhua (Tekniwas), P.O- Deuria, P.S- Rivilganj, Dist- Saran at Chapra 2.

Birbal Rai @ Alok Kumar Yadav @ Birbal Kumar @ Alok Kumar S/oDashrath Rai Village-Lakshmipur Jakhua (Tekniwas), P.O- Deuria, P.SRivilganj, Dist- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Jeetendra Narayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Rivilganj P.S. Case No. 99 of 2023 for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 341, 323, 420, 504 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The learned APP for the State submits that the offences for which the instant FIR has been instituted against the petitioners carries punishment of seven years and less, the said submission of the learned APP is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19622 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/2

4. The learned counsel for the petitioners next submits that investigation in the case against the petitioners is still continuing, but then the petitioners have not been given notice under Section 41(1)(b) of the Cr.P.C.

5. In view of the submission made by the learned APP, the anticipatory bail application is disposed of in terms of the order dated 13-2-2024 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. The State of Bihar).

6. The petitioners would be at liberty to file a representation before the concerned Superintendent of Police and the Investigating Officer of the case within a period of three weeks from today with a web copy of the order dated 13-2-2024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari Vs. the state of Bihar) and the concerned Superintendent of Police shall ensure that the Investigating Officer of the case strictly adheres to the directions contained in the the order dated 13-22024 in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 3536 of 2024 (Naushad Ansari vs. The State of Bihar).

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T