← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20563/2025bail rejected

Mual Bind v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-30Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20563 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-269 Year-2024 Thana- RAMGARH District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== Mual Bind S/o- Late Rambachan Bind, R/o Village- Sonwarsa, PS- Ramgarh (Nuaon), Dist- Kaimur at Bhabua.

... ... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Tribhuwan Narayan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 30-04-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Ramgarh (Nuaon) P.S. Case No. 269 of 2024, dated 04.08.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 103(1) and 238(a) read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S.

3. As per the prosecution case, the informant received information that the daughter of one Mual Bind (petitioner) has committed suicide by hanging herself and when the police reached the house of Mual Bind, they did not get any information regarding whereabout of the deceased and on the next day, dead body of a girl was recovered from a river which was identified as Hiramuni Kumari, i.e., the daughter of Mual

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20563 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 2/3 Bind and it appeared that someone has killed the deceased by hanging her and to conceal the dead body, the same was thrown into the river.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case merely on the basis of suspicion. He has further submitted that the informant is not the eyewitness to the alleged occurrence. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 25.11.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the bail petition of the petitioner and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR and there is specific allegation against him that he along with his wife has killed their minor daughter and thrown her dead body into the river, apart from that, the post-mortem report suggests the cause of death to be strangulation and the injuries are found to be ante-mortem and petitioner is father of the deceased.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as heinous nature of allegation levelled against the petitioner, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner, above-named, on bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20563 of 2025(2) dt.30-04-2025 3/3

7. Learned Trial Court is directed to expedite and conclude the trial at the earliest.

8. The application stands rejected.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Shahnawaz/- U T