Patna High CourtL.P.A/978/2014dismissed

Nawal Kishore Sharma And ANR v. The Union Of India And ORS

2017-04-06Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.978 of 2014 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1348 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Nawal Kishore Sharma S/o Late Ram Nandan Singh resident of village - Jagmal Bigha, P.O. Kattauna, P.S. Khusrupur,District - Patna .... .... Appellants

Versus

1. The Union of India through the Project Director National Highway Authority of India (NHAI) P.I.U., Patna Near Basawan Park, D - 63, Sri Krishna Puri Road, Patna

2. Superintendent Engineer, Patna - Bakhtiyarpur Sction Nh -03, D - 63, S.K. Puri Road, Patna

3. Executive Engineer, Patna - Bakhtiyarpur Sction NH -03

4. The District Magistrate, Patna

5. District Land Acquisition Officer, Patna .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellants : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Manu For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 06-04-2017 Heard counsel for the appellant. Perused the order of the learned single Judge dated 13.08.2013 as also the original writ application, the pleading and the relief prayed therein. The submissions which are being made now at the appellate stage on the various facets of the compensation etc. were not the issue urged. The only thing, which emerges from the reading of the writ as well as the order of the learned single Judge, was that the allegation was made against the authorities of National Highway Authority of India that they were demanding bribe for working out a

Patna High Court LPA No.978 of 2014 dt.06-04-2017 2/2 higher compensation and there has been discrimination. Both these aspects have been negated by the learned single Judge from the materials and the pleadings. Therefore, the order in question does not require any interference.

Appeal is dismissed.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 07.04.2017 Transmission Date N/A