Arun Sharma @ Arun Kumar Sharma v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.63310 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-119 Year-2004 Thana- KATORIYA District- Banka ====================================================== Arun Sharma @ Arun Kumar Sharma Son of Bhagwan Sharma, Resident of Village- Rangaon, P.S.- Tarapur, District- Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ranjan Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Smt Renu Kumari (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
Petitioner, who is in custody, seeks bail in connection with Katoria (Suiya) P.S. Case No. 119 of 2004 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1B)A/26/35 of Arms Act. Petitioner was granted bail in this case on 08.02.2005, but his bail bond was cancelled on 29.06.2009 because of his non-appearance, petitioner surrendered on 14.05.2018 since then he is in custody.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he will not misuse the privilege of bail any further. It is further submitted that the petitioner was a labour and went to Delhi to earn his livelihood but the Pairvikar did not do the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.63310 of 2018(2) dt.26-10-2018 2/2 parivi of the case properly as a result of which the bail bond of the petitioner was cancelled. Petitioner is in custody since 14.05.2018 and as such he may be granted regular bail. Considering the aforesaid fact and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Banka, in connection with Katoriya (Suiya) P.S. Case No. 119 of 2004 with conditions that petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and sufficient reason, trial court will be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(S. Kumar, J) Rajiv/Manoj U T