Ajay Kumar v. The Union Of India And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 20250 of 2014 ====================================================== Ajay Kumar Paswan, son of Basant Paswan, Resident of Village- & PostMore, P.S.- Mokama, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The Union of India through Secretary, F.C.I., Government of India, New Delhi
2. The Secretary, F.C.I., Government of India, New Delhi
3. The General Manager, F.C.I., Govt. of India, Munger
4. The Regional Manager, F.C.I., Bihar Circle, Patna
5. The Manager, F.C.I. Bihar Kachahari Road, Bhagalpur .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : M/s Amresh Kr Singh & Rajesh Kr Sinha, Advs For the Respondent/s : Mr. Prabhakar Tekriwal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 24-01-2018 Heard counsel for the petitioner and the respondentCorporation. Petitioner has approached this Court for a direction to the respondents to consider his case for appointment on compassionate grounds. The petitioner's case is that his father Basant Paswan died in harness on 28.08.2012 when he was working as a labourer in the respondent-Corporation. Annexure 4 is the representation of the petitioner which is dated 06.06.2014. Counsel for the respondent-Corporation submits that the application should have been made before the General Manager of the Corporation and not to the Branch Manager as has
Patna High Court CWJC No.20250 of 2014 (2) dt.24-01-2018 2/2 been done by the petitioner.
Be that as it may, since the petitioner's entitlement to compassionate appointment has to be considered in light of the scheme prevalent in the Corporation, there would be no useful purpose in keeping the writ petition pending. Let the General Manager (respondent No 3) consider the petitioner's claim for appointment on compassionate ground in light of his application dated 06.06.2014 (Annexure 4 of the writ petition) in accordance with the prevalent scheme for appointment and in accordance with law expeditiously and preferably within eight weeks from today.
With this observation and direction, this writ petition is disposed of.
(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- U