Anil Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.65314 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -348 Year- 2018 Thana -JAMUI District- JAMUI ======================================================

1. Anil Yadav, Son of Tarni Yadav, Resident of Village Thegua, Police Station and District Jamui.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pankaj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anil Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 06-11-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Jamui P.S.case No.348 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of taking the son of the informant to Bokaro and since then his son is traceless and he has suspected the hands of the petitioner.

Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that the victim boy has been recovered and his statement was recorded under Section 164 of the Cr.P.C. and he has categorically stated that nothing wrong has been done with him. The petitioner is in custody since 8.8.2018.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.65314 of 2018 (2) dt.06-11-2018 2/2 Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Jamui in connection with Jamui P.S.Case No.348 of 2018.

With following conditions :

(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and in the event of failure to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail bond.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T