Subhash Basfor @ Subash Basfor v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22578 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-601 Year-2025 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

Subhash Basfor @ Subash Basfor Son of Late Tuntun Basfor R/O Village - Indra Nagar Daldali Bazar, P.S.- Chapra Town, Dist.- Saran. 2.

Bikram Kumar @ Vikram Kumar Son of Subhash Basfor @ Subash Basfor R/O Village - Indra Nagar Daldali Bazar, P.S.- Chapra Town, Dist.- Saran. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Md. Fahimuddin, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 07-04-2026 Heard Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioners as well as Md. Fahimuddin, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. Petitioners seeks bail who is in custody since 06.11.2025 in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 601 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 02.11.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 331(4) and 305 of the Bharatiya Nyay Sanhita, 2023.

3. According to prosecution case, the informant alleged that when he went inside the house of one Badal Kumar Gupta, he found the lock of the house broken and gold and silver ornaments worth of Rs.10,50,000/- and cash of Rs.50,000/-were looted by unknown miscreants.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22578 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have clean antecedent and they falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioners are not named in the FIR and their name transpired on the basis of confessional statement of one Julmi @ Santosh Malik and nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution. The police after investigation submitted charge-sheet against the petitioners and the petitioners are in custody since 06.11.2025.

5. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, petitioners has clean antecedent and they are not named in the FIR and till date no TIP has been conducted by the prosecution, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran, Chapra in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 601 of 2025, subject to the following conditions:- i. Petitioners shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22578 of 2026(2) dt.07-04-2026 3/3 and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on their absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, their bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioners and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioners. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Suruchi/- U T