Vishal Kumar Sinha v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18762 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-913 Year-2016 Thana- SAHARSA District- Saharsa ====================================================== Vishal Kumar Sinha, aged about 45 years, (Male), Son of Sri Uma Kant Prasad, Resident of New Colony, Jailhatta, Sarvodya Nagar, Daltanganj, P.S.- Daltanganj, Distt - Palamau, Jharkhand ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satyam Shivam Sundaram For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 05-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.
Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 406, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against petitioner in the FIR is that petitioner being office bearer of DJN Commodities had duped the informant on the pretext of giving more interest on the amount deposited and giving high maturity value. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that petitioner did not misappropriate the money of informant. Petitioner is in custody since 22.07.2016.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18762 of 2019(3) dt.05-04-2019 2/2 Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Saharsa Sadar P.S. Case No. 913 of 2016, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.
(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.
(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.
(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T