Umesh Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.46884 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -437 Year- 2015 Thana -SONEPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Umesh Das, son of Bateshwar Das, resident of Village Konhara Ghat, P.S. Hajipur Town, District Vaishali .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Surendra Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 26-10-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 379 and 411/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Earlier this Court vide order dated 26.4.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No.17044 of 2016 rejected the prayer for bail of the petitioner with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after completion of nine months in jail custody.
The petitioner is in jail since 18.1.2016 and he has already completed nine months in jail custody. In this view of the matter, let petitioner, Umesh Das, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.46884 of 2016 (2) dt.26-10-2016 satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 437 of 2015, subject to the conditions that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner i.e. father, mother, wife or son (ii) If the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order including cancellation of bail (iii) Petitioner shall mark his presence before the nearest police station by 7th of every month till six months and (iv) petitioner would participate in the court proceeding and in the event of being absent on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/- U T