Raj Kishore Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.62886 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -135 Year- 2018 Thana -CHAPRA RAIL P.S. District- SARAN ====================================================== Raj Kishore Thakur, Son of Binda Thakur, a resident of Village- Enai Mubarakpur, P.S.- Revelganj, District- Saran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Harish Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sir Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 12-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Petitioner seeks bail in Chapra Rail P.S. Case No. 135/2018, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 379, 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is alleged that while the informant was traveling by train, 04 to 05 persons came and demanded money from him. On refusal they assaulted him and snatched his money, mobile and other articles and threw him from the train.

It has been submitted that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. From possession of petitioner one stolen mobile was recovered. He got that mobile from railway track. He is Barber.

Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. He is in custody

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62886 of 2018 (2) dt.12-10-2018 2/2 since 25.08.2018.

Considering the facts aforesaid, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate (Railway), Sonepur (Saran) in connection with Chapra Rail P.S. Case No. 135/2018, subject to the conditions: (1.) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2.) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and his absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will be sufficient to cancel his bail bonds.

(3.) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Vinita/- U T