Patna High CourtCR. REV./939/2014dismissed

Chandni Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-13Mr. Justice Chakradhari Sharan Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.939 of 2014 ===========================================================

1. Chandni Devi Wife of Dhirendra Thakur, daughter of Subhash Thakur resident of village and P.O. Khariya, P.S. Bariyarpur, District - Munger at present residing at Village Amadha, P.S. Rajoun, District - Banka .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Rajendra Thakur son of Late Dip Narayan Thakur

3. Sanyukta Devi Wife of Rajendra Thakur

4. Birendra Thakur son of Rajendra Thakur

5. Chhoti Devi wife of Birendra Thakur

6. Jitendra Thakur son of Rajendra Thakur

7. Mithilesh Thakur son of Rajendra Thakur

8. Nitish Thakur son of Rajendra Thakur All residents of village and P.O. Khariya, P.S. Bariyarpur, District - Munger .... .... .... Opposite Parties =============================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=============================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHAKRADHARI SHARAN SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 13-02-2017 The petitioner is complainant in Complaint Case No. 1097 of 2013 registered in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Banka making allegation against her husband and other members of the husband's family of commission of offences punishable under Sections 147, 323, 342, 379, 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Banka, by order dated 08.08.2014 passed in aforesaid Complaint Case No. 1097 of 2013 has taken cognizance of the offence punishable

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.939 of 2014 dt.13-02-2017 2/2 under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code and has summoned only the husband of the petitioner and not other members of the family. The petitioner is aggrieved by the said order dated 08.08.2014. I have perused the complaint petition. There is no specific allegation against the opposite parties which could have required the Magistrate to summon them also. The order suffers from no illegality requiring interference by this Court. This criminal revision application is, therefore, dismissed. (Chakradhari Sharan Singh, J) Ranjan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 20.02.2017 Transmission Date N.A.