Dheeraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.62919 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -405 Year- 2018 Thana -DEHRI TOWN District- SASARAM (ROHTAS) ====================================================== Dheeraj Kumar, S/O Anandi Sah @ Akshay Lal Prasad, R/M- Bari Bazar, Nasriganj, P.S. Nasriganj, District-Rohtas.
.... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Arun Kumar Singh, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Smt. Renuka Ratnakar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case for the offence registered under Sections 30(a), 38 and 41 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
The prosecution story, in brief, is that total 2073.6 liters wine is said to have been recovered.
It has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. There is no allegation of tampering with the witnesses alleged against the petitioner. It is alleged that total 2073.6 liters wine is recovered from the Pick-up Container and abandoned house of co-accused Kamlesh Singh. The Pick-up
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.62919 of 2018 (2) dt.09-10-2018 2/2 Container and abandoned house in question does not belong to the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has come on the basis of disclosure made by co-accused Sukhbir Singh. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr. P.C.
On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R/ Complaint Case. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned IInd Additional District & Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge, Excise, Rohtas, Sasaram, in connection with Dehri Town P.S. Case No. 405 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T