Arjun Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.55647 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -92 Year- 2016 Thana -SONEPUR District- SARAN ====================================================== Arjun Paswan, Son of Pujji Paswan, resident of Village- Parweja Bad Badurahi, P.S.- Sonepur, District- Saran at Chapra (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Atul Chandra For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Prem Kumar Jha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 11-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is seeking bail in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2016 registered for offences under sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner had earlier moved before this Court in Cr. Misc. No. 27046 of 2016 and this Court vide order dated 12.7.2016 had rejected the prayer for bail with a liberty to renew his prayer for bail after nine months' of judicial custody. The petitioner is in custody since 11.3.2016.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody, let the petitioner, namely, Arjun

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.55647 of 2016 (2) dt.11-01-2017 Paswan, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Saran at Chapra in connection with Sonepur P.S. Case No. 92 of 2016, subject to the condition that (i) one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner (ii) if the petitioner is found involved in future in similar type of case, the prosecution will be at liberty to make prayer for cancellation of his bail and the court below will pass necessary order, including cancellation of bail and (iii) the petitioner would cooperate the proceeding of the court below. In event of failure to appear on two consecutive dates, the court below will be at liberty to pass the order, including cancellation of bail bonds.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T