Raj Kumar Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21062 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-128 Year-2022 Thana- LAUKARIA District- West Champaran ====================================================== Raj Kumar Ram Son Of Manik Ram R/O Village- Pakari, P.S.- Ramnagar, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Anand Kishore Choudhary For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Mohammad Sufyan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 22-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 302, 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
It is a case of commission of murder of the informant's son, namely, Dinesh Ram by FIR named accused persons including this petitioner.
It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No one is the eye witness of the alleged occurrence. As per F.I.R., the petitioner has illicit relation with the wife of deceased and the deceased always used to oppose the petitioner for the same and due to that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21062 of 2023(4) dt.22-08-2023 2/2 reason only on the basis of suspicion, the name of the petitioner has been dragged in the present case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner and other co-accused persons and no specific overt act has been made against the petitioner. During investigation, no consistent evidence has come against the petitioner to support the allegation levelled against him. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and he is languishing in judicial custody since 26.11.2022. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the informant and submitted that petitioner is named in the FIR.
Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-II, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Laukaria P.S. Case No. 128 of 2022.
(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) lata/- U T