Patna High CourtCR. MISC./45260/2014disposed

Munna Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-30Mr. Justice Aditya Kumar Trivedi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44221 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -306 Year- 2013 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Bitoo Singh S/o Jainandan Singh Resident of village- Kaura, P.S.- Jagdishpur, Dist.- Bhojpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== With Criminal Miscellaneous No.45260 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -306 Year- 2013 Thana -JAGDIHSPUR District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Munna Singh s/o Rambaboo Singh Resident of Village - Kaura P.S. - Jagdishpur, Dist - Bhojpur.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.44221 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. R.B.Roy Raman, A.P.P. (In Cr.Misc. No.45260 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajani Ranjan Pd. Singh, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shardanand Jha, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ADITYA KUMAR TRIVEDI ORAL ORDER 30-03-2015 Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44221 of 2014 wherein Bitoo Singh is the petitioner and Criminal Miscellaneous No. 45260 of 2014 wherein Munna Singh, the son of Rambaboo Singh is the petitioner commonly originate out of Jadishpur P.S. Case No. 306 of 2013 and on account thereof, have been heard together and are being disposed of by a common order.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44221 of 2014 (3) dt.30-03-2015 2/2 Supplementary affidavit has been filed on behalf of petitioner of Criminal Miscellaneous No. 44221 of 2014 taken on record.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned A.P.P. for the State.

Taking into account, the allegations subsisting against the petitioners, as such, petitioners are directed to surrender before the learned lower court with a prayer of bail, which the learned lower court will favourably consider in the background of the fact that petitioners are not at all identified as an author of the injury.

With the aforesaid observation, both these petitions are disposed of.

(Aditya Kumar Trivedi, J.) Vats/- U T