Patna High CourtCR. REV./495/2013disposed

Sunita Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-27Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.495 of 2013 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -null Year- null Thana -null District- PATNA ===========================================================

1. Sunita Devi, wife of Sri Madhu Kumar, resident of village Khanpuri Tineri, P.S.- Masaurhi, District- Patna .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ramashish Singh, son of late Hiralal Singh, village-Tineri, P.S.-Masaurhi, District- Patna,

3. Santosh Kumar Singh, Sub-Inspector, Masaurhi,

4. Kamlesh Singh, Jeep Driver, Masauri, P.S.-Masaurhi, District- Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Shailesh Kr. Singh, Advocate Mr. Ujjawal Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Ms. Anita Kumari, APP Mr. Ajay Kumar-I, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-03-2015

1. The Petitioner, who is the Complainant, is aggrieved with the dismissal of Complaint Case No.257 of 2011 by the Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Masaurhi, Patna, vide order dated 19.03.2013.

2. It has been submitted that even though the Petitioner and her witnesses had supported the prosecution case but the Complaint Petition was dismissed for untenable reasons.

3. On the other hand, counsel(s) for the private Opposite Parties submits that First Information Report by way of Masaurhi P.S. Case No.446 of 2011 dated 09.11.2011 was instituted

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.495 of 2013 dt.27-03-2015 2/2 against the Complainant-Petitioner and it is in retaliation that the present case has been filed.

4. It appears that the counter version is also under the minor provision of law.

5. In the facts and circumstances, I am not inclined to interfere in the matter.

6. The revision application is dismissed.

7. However, in the interest of the parties, proceedings of Masaurhi P.S. Case No.446 of 2011 is also dropped. (Anjana Prakash, J) JA/- U T