← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./66000/2018bail granted

Manish Kumar Singh @ Bharkul @ Bharkul Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-12-14Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.66000 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-341 Year-2017 Thana- CHAPRA MUFFASIL District- Saran ====================================================== Manish Kumar Singh @ Bharkul @ Bharkul Singh Son of Satyendra Singh Resident of Village-Fakuli, P.S. Chapra Mufassil, Distt.-Saran,.Bihar ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Nagendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner is in custody since 31.10.2017 in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.341 of 2017 giving rise to B.P. No.199 of 2018 registered for the offence under Sections 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 25(1-b)a/26/35 of the Arms Act.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the prayer of the bail was earlier rejected in Cr.Misc. No.14077 of 2018 vide order dated 09.03.2018 with liberty to the petitioner to renew his prayer for bail after 6 months if the trial is not concluded. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that till date the trial has not been concluded and as such the petitioner may be extended the privilege of bail.

Considering the nature of allegation and in view of

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.66000 of 2018(2) dt.14-12-2018 2/2 the fact that the trial has not been yet been concluded, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJMIX, Saran at Chapra, in connection with Chapra Muffasil P.S. Case No.341 of 2017 giving rise to B.P. No.199 of 2018, subject to the following conditions:

(1) One of the bailors will be his father.

(2) The petitioner shall not indulge himself in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

(3) The petitioner shall remain physically present in court on each and every date during trial and in the event of his failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bonds shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned court concerned.

(4)The petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation, if not already concluded, and make himself available as and when so required and in case of failure, the State shall be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail. (Anjana Mishra, J) khushbu/-rakesh U T