← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19024/2020bail granted

Raushan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2020-06-05Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19024 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1110 Year-2019 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Raushan Kumar Son of Raj Kumar Paswan Resident of Village/Mohalla-R.N. College, Indrapuri Colony Hajipur, Police Station-Hajipur Town, DistrictVaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Parmeshwar Mehta ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 05-06-2020 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

This relates to grant of bail in Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1110 of 2019, registered for the offence under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 25(1-b)1, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

As per F.I.R., there is recovery of one country-made pistol and a live cartridge of .315 bore from the petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of petitioner that petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated. No recovery has been made from the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 13-12-2019, having clean antecedent.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the bail application is allowed.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19024 of 2020(2) dt.05-06-2020 2/2 Let the above-named petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 1110 of 2019 on the following conditions:

"(1) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the Court and shall remain physically present, as directed by the Court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail-bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

(2) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.".

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J.) anay U T