← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./23929/2023bail granted

Abhishek Kumar @ Praduman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2023-07-17Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.23929 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2023 Thana- BACHHWARA District- Begusarai ====================================================== Abhishek Kumar @ Praduman Kumar Son Of Late Kari Kunwar Resident Of Village Jhumatia, Ward No.11, P.S - Bachwara, District - Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sunil Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Pramod Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks from today.

Petitioner seeks bail who is in custody since 17.01.2023 in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 14 of 2023, F.I.R. dated 16.01.2023 for the offences punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

According to prosecution case, this petitioner open fired upon the informant due to which the informant sustained firearm injury. It is further alleged that one bullet hit the informant's chest and two bullets hit on his back. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

2/4 petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. He further submits that the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R. is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offences as alleged in the F.I.R. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties and no injury report is available on the record. He further submits that it has come in paragraph 18 of the case diary that when the prosecution went to the hospital to get the injury report of the informant, he found that no injury report was available there and the informant has not been examined by the doctor in the hospital and only after obtaining/preparing the parcha from the hospital, the informant fled away from the hospital. He further submits that in view of the aforesaid, no case is made out under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code against the petitioner and the police after investigation submitted the charge sheet against the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 17.01.2023.

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries three criminal antecedent other than the present one but fairly submits on the basis of paragraph 3 of the bail petition that the petitioner is on bail in all the three

3/4 cases.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Begusasrai in connection with Bachhwara P.S. Case No. 14 of 2023, subject to the following conditions:-

1. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below.

2. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.

3. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail

4/4 bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.

(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T