Anant Kumar @ Pintu v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.16709 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -661 Year- 2016 Thana -NAWADA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Anant Kumar @ Pintu, son of Late Ashok Kumar, Resident of MohallaStation Road, Nawada, P.S.- Nawada, District- Nawada. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Thakur, Advocate. Mr. Pravin Kumr, Advocate.

Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate.

For the State : Md. Fahimuddin, APP. For the informant : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 25-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 661 of 2016, registered under Sections 384 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/5 of the Explosive Substance Act.

The accusation is that, on 24.11.2016, in the morning, some miscreants came at the door of the informant, Santosh Kumar, and hurled the Bomb and also dropped letter through which demanding ransom. The informant gave

information on 29.07.2016, 01.08.2016, 20.08.2016 and 17.11.2016, to the Officer-in-charge, Nawada Police Station and Superintendent of Police, Nawada, but no action was taken due to that reason they again hurled the bomb at the door of the informant, in which, Jeetu Singh, Badri Singh and Satish Singh having their hand and the petitioner being Director of Bahe Guru Construction has also hand in the occurrence. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, in fact, there is land dispute in between the F.I.R. named accused persons and the informant, regarding which, Title Suit No. 473 of 2016 is pending in the court of Sub-Judge, Nawada. In fact, petitioner is the relative of F.I.R. named accused persons due to that reason his name has been disclosed by the informant. Further submission is that petitioner is accused in one another case, in which, he is on bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada, in connection with Nawada Town P.S. Case No. 661

of 2016, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T