Tinku Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20797 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-150 Year-2014 Thana- KASIMBAZAR District- Munger ====================================================== TINKU YADAV Son of Nepali Yadav Resident of Village - Nandlalpur, P.S.- Muffasil, District- Munger ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Kaushal Kishor, Adv.
For the State Mr. J.K. Singh, APP For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Raj Kr. Chaudhary, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 26-03-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 364/120B, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
In pursuance to the order dated 26.02.2021, status report of trial in connection with Sessions Trial No. 269 of 2016 arising out of Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 150 of 2014 has been received and kept at Flag-A, in which it is stated that out of twelve charge-sheet witnesses, all five non-official witnesses have been examined so far and only official witnesses have to be examined. The evidence process is pending for want of original record of S.T. No. 52 of 2015 which has been transmitted to Hon'ble High Court, Patna for reference in Cr.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20797 of 2020(3) dt.26-03-2021 2/2 Appeal (D.B.) No. 1188 of 2017 dated 01.11.2017. Considering the present stage of trial, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Accordingly, his payer for bail is rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 269 of 2016 arising out of Kasim Bazar P.S. Case No. 150 of 2014 pending before the court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger.
However, Trial Court is directed to conclude the trial within nine months. Office is also directed to return the original record of S.T. No. 52 of 2015, after preparing shadow of the same, to the concerned court. Trial Court is further directed to send back the said record after conclusion of trial. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T