Sujeet Vishwakarma v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.64053 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-14 Year-2018 Thana- MAHILA PS District- Gaya ====================================================== Sujeet Vishwakarma, Son of Tapeshwar Vishwakarma, Resident of VillageMadanpur, P.S.- Madanpur, DistrictAurangabad.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in Gaya Mahila P.S. Case No. 14 of 2018 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 342, 498A, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is of torturing the Informant along with his family members for non fulfillment of demand of dowry.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has been further submitted that petitioner never demanded dowry or subjected her to cruelty. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent and is in custody since 29.07.2018.

Learned counsel for the Informant vehemently opposes the prayer for bail and submits that there is specific allegation against the petitioner for torture and demand of dowry. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64053 of 2018(2) dt.02-11-2018 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate-Gaya, in connection with Gaya Mahila P.S. Case No. 14 of 2018 , with following conditions:-

(1) Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be represented on each and every date fixed by the court.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) ranjan/- U