Ramesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.44862 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2016 Thana -MAHILA PS District- BUXAR ====================================================== 1.

Ramesh Yadav Son of Kamakhya Yadav @Kamaichha Yadav@Amakhya Yadav Resident of Village Keshopur , P.S. Simari,(Tilak Raika Hata O.P), District Buxar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Satyadev Prasad Singh Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 29-11-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Taking into consideration that the victim has specifically stated in her statement recorded under section 164 of the Cr.P.C that petitioner made attempt to commit rape on her, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail and hence, his prayer for bail in connection with POCSO Case No. 10 of 2016 arising out of Buxar ( Mahila) P.S.Case No. 35 of 2016, pending in the court of Additional Sessions Judge 1st , Buxar cum Special Judge POCSO Act , Buxar stands rejected.

However, the learned trial court should expedite the trial of the petitioner and try to conclude the same as early as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.44862 of 2016 (3) dt.28-11-2016 2/2 possible, within six months, from the date of receipt/ production of a copy of this order.

(Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) N.K/- U T