Patna High CourtCR. MISC./18796/2017dismissed

Ajit Verma v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-05-08Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.18796 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -474 Year- 2016 Thana -BUXAR COMPLAINT CASE DistrictBUXAR ====================================================== Ajit Verma, Son of Mithailal Verma, resident of Village - Badarpur, Sourav Bihar, Near Amar Market, Block No. 285, G.12, P.S. Jaitpur, DistrictBadarpur, New Delhi. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

State of Bihar & Anr .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Bachan Jee Ojha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Dr. Rabindra Kumar For opposite party no. 2 : Mr. Satyapal Singh. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 08-05-2017 The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 474(C) of 2016, registered for offences punishable under Sections 498(A) Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

Allegation against the petitioner is demand of dowry and torture.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. In fact, father of the complainant cheated the petitioner by getting her daughter married with the petitioner and concealed the fact that complainant is seriously ill as she is suffering from various illness such as brain tumor and other serious diseases before, for which the petitioner was bearing all the medical expenses and complainant herself had

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.18796 of 2017 (2) dt.08-05-2017 2/2 left the house of the petitioner and filed this false and concocted case as he has never tortured the complainant for demand of dowry.

Heard learned A.P.P. and learned counsel for the informant, they have opposed the prayer for bail. Having heard both sides, considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the conduct of the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant the petitioner the privilege of bail, his application for anticipatory bail is, accordingly, rejected. Let petitioner surrender before the court below and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the court below on the merit of the case, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T