← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19617/2025disposed

Pawan Singh @ Pawan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2025-04-23Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19617 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-275 Year-2024 Thana- MASHRAK District- Saran ====================================================== Pawan Singh @ Pawan Kumar S/o Late Baldev Singh R/V Karan Kudariya P.S-Mashrak, Dist.- Saran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeet Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise (Amendment) Act, 2022.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has antecedent of one case.

4. Allegation is of recovery of 6.480 litres of liquor from a motorcycle.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner was not arrested from the spot, as such, nothing was recovered from his conscious possession. It is further submitted that petitioner came to be implicated based on the fact that he is owner of the seized motorcycle. It is next submitted that no prudent person would use his own vehicle for committing an

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19617 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 2/3 occurrence and thus would create evidence against himself and hence would get implicated. It is also submitted that petitioner was completely unaware that Sadam Hussain would misuse the vehicle in the manner as alleged who had taken the motorcycle on the pretext that he intends to purchase the same and had also paid the consideration amount.

6. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

7. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, let the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Mashrak P.S. Case No. 275 of 2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

8. It is made clear that thereafter the learned trial court shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that petitioner has antecedent of more than one case, it would be presumed that petitioner had concealed his

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19617 of 2025(2) dt.23-04-2025 3/3 antecedent before this Court at para 3 of the anticipatory bail application in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall not be confirmed but if it is found on verification that petitioner has antecedent of only one case in that event the provisional anticipatory bail order shall be confirmed forthwith. Satyavrat Verma, J) Kundan/- U T