Guddu Sahni @ Nishant Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.29827 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-218 Year-2020 Thana- SARAI RANJAN District- Samastipur ====================================================== Guddu Sahni @ Nishant Kumar S/O - Late Siya Ram Sahni R/V - Gunai Bashi, P.S. - Tajpur, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/S

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms. Pronoti Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 08-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Sarairanjan P. S. Case No.218 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Section 392 of the Indian Penal Code. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 31.01.2021, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and has antecedent of two cases as stated in the supplementary affidavit.

The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the informant alleges that he is the Branch Manager of Bandhan Bank, Sarairanjan, College Road and on 30.12.2020 at 12.10 P.M., three accused persons with their face covered with cloth, entered the bank and looted Rs.34,000/- along with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29827 of 2021(4) dt.08-03-2022 2/3 mobile and one tab on gun point and the criminals were in the age group of 25-30 years.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the F.I.R. against unknown. The petitioner came to be implicated as the looted tab was recovered from his possession. The learned counsel submits that petitioner had purchased that tab unknowingly that it was a looted article. The learned counsel further submits that despite the petitioner being in custody, he has not been put on T. I. Parade in order to ascertain his identity whether he participated in the occurrence or not. Learned A.P.P. opposes the bail application.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody, charge-sheet has been submitted in this case and was not put on T. I. Parade, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M. 3rd, Samastipur in connection with Sarairanjan P. S. Case No.218 of 2020, subject to condition that one of the bailors shall be the aunt of the petitioner namely, Rajvanshi Devi and in the event, if the petitioner is implicated in a case of similar nature and the same comes to the notice of the learned Court below, the learned

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.29827 of 2021(4) dt.08-03-2022 3/3 Court below shall forthwith cancel his bail bonds. The application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T