Ghura Bind And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64483 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.64483 of 2018 ======================================================
1. Ghura Bind, Son of Sri Bhikhi Bind @ Deo Muni Bind,
2. Manu Bind, Son of Sri Nirmal Bind, Both residents of VillagePandeypur, P.S.- Karamchat, District- Kaimur (Bhabhua). .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Yogendra Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 26-10-2018 The petitioners seek bail in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 67 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 272 and 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a), (c) and (d)/36 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016. Allegation is of recovery of 2.5 litres of mahua liquor and 2 kilograms of mahua flower.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he has falsely been implicated in this case and no recovery has been made from the conscious possession of the petitioner. He has no criminal antecedent and has been in judicial custody since 29.08.2018.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides, considering the facts and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.64483 of 2018 (2) dt.26-10-2018 circumstances of the case, nature of allegation, quantity of recovery and period of custody and also that petitioner has no criminal antecedent, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 25,000 (Rs. Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise, Kaimur at Bhabhua, in connection with Karamchat P.S. Case No. 67 of 2018, subject to the condition that:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned Court.
(ii) It is made clear that if the petitioner again found involved in any of the like offences, in future, prosecution will be free to move for cancellation of his bail bonds.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sunil/- U T