Sintu Paswan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.12601 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -252 Year- 2015 Thana -DAUDNAGAR District- AURANGABAD ====================================================== Sintu Paswan Son of Arjun Paswan Resident of Village - Shamsher Nagar P.S. Daudnagar, District - Aurangabad (Bihar). .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Dr. Leelawati Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Sri Nand Kishore Pd, APP For the Informant : Mr. Rajendra Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-05-2017 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail for offences punishable under Sections 363, 374, 147 and 149 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. Later on, during investigation his name has transpired.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the informant in his re-statement, i.e., after two months, has disclosed the name of the petitioner, which appears from para-55 of the case diary.

Heard learned A.P.P. as well as learned counsel for the informant. They have opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail. Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that name

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.12601 of 2017 (3) dt.02-05-2017 2/2 of the petition is not in the F.I.R. and it has come in the restatement of the informant, let above named petitioner, in the event of arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Aurangabad, in connection with Daudnagar P.S. Case no. 252 of 2015 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and also subject to the conditions that (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioner shall cooperate in the investigation and make himself available before the police as and when required. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T