Subham @ Chada v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19592 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-399 Year-2018 Thana- RUPASPUR District- Patna ====================================================== SUBHAM @ CHADA S/o Shambhu Nath Gupta Resident of Pethiya Bazar, Ward No. 1, P.S.- Danapur, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 01-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 399 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399, 402, 379, 411, 414 of the Indian Penal Code, Sections 25(1-B)A, 26 and 35 of Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that one country made pistol and two live cartridges have been recovered from possession of the accused persons including petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 17.9.2018.

Keeping in view the period spent by the petitioner in custody, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19592 of 2019(2) dt.01-04-2019 2/2 like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Danapur, in connection with Rupaspur P.S. Case No. 399 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be the close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows with further conditions which are as follows:

(i) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court (ii) In absence on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled and (iii) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that event, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T