Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41155/2016bail granted

Kailash Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2016-09-29Mr. Justice Vikash Jain2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41155 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -156 Year- 2016 Thana -RAJAULI District- NAWADA ====================================================== Kailash Chaudhary, son of Ganauri Chaudhary, Resident of Village Dhamni, P.S. - Rajauli, District - Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party: APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 29-09-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner is in custody since 08.07.2016 in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 156 of 2016 for the offences alleged under Sections 47(A) and 53(A) of the Bihar Excise (Amendment) Act.

3. It is submitted that the petitioner has been falsely implicated and in any event, recovery of 7 litres of illicit country made Mahua liquor has been made from the house of the joint family members. Petitioner claims clean antecedents.

4. Having regard to the entirety of the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Nawada in connection with Rajauli P.S. Case No. 156 of 2016 with the following conditions: (i) That one of the bailors shall be a close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) That the petitioner shall not indulge in any similar offence till conclusion of the trial.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41155 of 2016 (2) dt.29-09-2016 2/2 (iii) That the petitioner shall remain physically present in Court on each and every date during trial and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the learned Court concerned.

(Vikash Jain, J) B.T/Ibrar U T