← Library
Patna High CourtCR. REV./678/2013disposed

Kumari Nirmala Devi And ORS. v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2015-04-06Justice Smt. Anjana Prakash2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Revision No.678 of 2013 ======================================================

1. Kumari Nirmala Devi W/O Ram Narayan Mahto @ Kalpu Mahto Resident Of Village- Sheo Nagar, P.S.- Bakhari, District- Begusarai.

2. Ram Narayan Mahto @ Kalpu Mahto S/O Nathuni Mahto Resident Of Village- Sheo Nagar, P.S.- Bakhari, District- Begusarai.

3. Manish Kumar @ Manish Kr. Mahto S/O Ram Narayan Mahto @Kalpu Mahto Resident Of Village- Sheo Nagar, P.S.- Bakhari, District- Begusarai.

4. Ram Naresh Mahto S/O Late Ram Chandra Mahto Resident Of VillageKhan Jahanpur, Police Station- Cheriya Bariyarpur, District- Begusarai.

5. Ramanand Mahto S/O Late Ram Chandra Mahto Resident Of VillageKhan Jahanpur, Police Station- Cheriya Bariyarpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar.

2. Suman Devi W/O Ram Bilash Mahto, D/O Ram Bahadur Mahto At Present Resident Of Village- Nurulahpur, Police Station- Khodawandpur, District- Begusarai.

.... .... Opposite parties.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Ram Sumiran Rai, Advocate. For the State : Mr. J.Upadhyay(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 06-04-2015 Petitioners seek quashing of the order dated 15.04.2013 by which the Additional Sessions Judge-V, Begusarai, in Cr. Rev. No. 70 of 2011 has remanded the Complaint Case No. 1637C of 2010 on the point of cognizance against the present petitioners. It has been submitted that till date the Magistrate has not passed any order.

Since the order is only of remand, the application is disposed of with a direction to the Magistrate concerned to pass an order in accordance with law ignoring the observation of the

Patna High Court CR. REV. No.678 of 2013 (7) dt.06-04-2015 2 / 2 Revisional Court and also consider as to whether in the facts of the case any offence is made out against the present petitioners within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of this order. U.K./- (Anjana Prakash, J) U T