Patna High CourtCWJC/19401/2014dismissed

Satya Narayan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-10-17Mr. Justice Birendra Prasad Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19401 of 2014 ====================================================== Satya Narayan Yadav Son of Late Sarvajeet Yadav, Resident of Village - Panjarkatta, P.S. - Narpatganj, District - Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Collector, Araria

3. The Deputy Collector Land Reforms Farbesganj, Araria

4. The Circle Officer, Narpatganj, Araria

5. Sabiylal Yadav Son of Late Sarvajeet Yadav, Resident of Village - Panjarkatta, P.S. - Narpatganj (Araria) .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : None. For the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4 : Mr. Kumar Pankaj, AC to SC-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA PRASAD VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-10-2016 Despite repeated calls, none appears on behalf of the petitioner in support of the present writ petition, though the names of the learned counsel appearing on his behalf are printed in the daily cause list.

The learned AC to SC-5 appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 1 to 4, by referring to the averments made in the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent no. 3, submits that in view of the disposal of Mutation Appeal Nos. 3 and 4 of 2013-14, the present matter has become infructuous. In the writ petition the petitioner has prayed for issuance of a direction to the respondent D.C.L.R. Forbesganj for disposal of Mutation Appeal Nos. 3 of 2013-14 and 4 of 2013-14. Apparently, the aforesaid two mutation appeals have already been disposed of by the respondent D.C.L.R., Forbesganj. The orders passed by him have been brought on the record as Annexure-A and A/1 to the counter-affidavit filed on behalf of the respondent

Patna High Court CWJC No.19401 of 2014 (2) dt.17-10-2016 2/2 no. 3.

In above view of the matter, the present writ petition has become infructuous and is, accordingly, dismissed. (Birendra Prasad Verma, J) BTiwary/- U