Krishna Sah @ Krishna Gupta v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.30297 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-48 Year-2020 Thana- AGRER District- Rohtas ====================================================== 1.
Krishna Sah @ Krishna Gupta S/o Ram Jag Sah Resident of VillageKundwa, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas. 2.
Lakshmini Devi @ Munni Devi @ Laxmina Devi W/o Dinesh Sah, D/o Ram Jag Sah Resident of Village- Kundwa, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas At present resident of Village- Semara, P.S.- Agrer, District- Rohtas. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Krishna Pd. Singh, Sr. Adv.
Mr. Bhaskar Shankar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Mithilesh Kr. Khare, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 18-01-2022 Learned senior counsel for the petitioners does not want to press the bail application with regard to petitioner no. 1. Accordingly, the application is dismissed as not pressed with regard to petitioner no. 1.
Heard learned senior counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State through the virtual court proceeding.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within three weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.
The petitioner is apprehending her arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B/34 of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30297 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2022 2/3 the Indian Penal Code.
Prosecution case is that the daughter of the informant has been killed by the petitioner along with her family members. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that petitioner is the married Nanad of the deceased and husband of the deceased is already in judicial custody as stated by the learned counsel for the petitioner before this Court. He submits that there is no specific allegation against the petitioner. He further submits that petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application.
Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the above named petitioner in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Agrer P.S. Case No. 48 of 2020, subject to
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.30297 of 2021(2) dt.18-01-2022 3/3 the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. However, learned court below is directed to verify the fact that the husband of the deceased is in custody. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) devendra/- U T