← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31010/2021bail granted

Hariom Sharaf @ Harimohan Sharaf v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-10Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.31010 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-10 Year-2021 Thana- SONBERSA District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== 1.

HARIOM SHARAF @ HARIMOHAN SHARAF SON OF RANJAY SHARAF R/O MOHALLA- MIRCHAIPATTI, P.S.- SITAMARHI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI.

2.

RAM BABU SINGH SON OF LATE SURAJ SINGH R/O MOHALLAMIRCHAIPATTI, P.S.- SITAMARHI, DISTRICT- SITAMARHI ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 10-12-2021 The instant case has been taken up for consideration through the mode of Video conferencing in view of the prevailing situation on account of COVID 19 Pandemic, requiring social distancing.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek regular bail in connection with Sonebarsa PS case no. 10 of 2021 instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 414, 467, 468/34 of Indian Penal Code. The allegation is regarding recovery of illicit liquor from a car and the petitioners were found sitting in the said car. The learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent, have been falsely implicated in

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.31010 of 2021(2) dt.10-12-2021 2/2 the present case, are having clean antecedent and are languishing in custody since 11.01.2021. The learned counsel for the petitioners, by referring to paragraph no. 8 of the present petition, has further submitted that the petitioners have got no concern with the vehicle in question.

Per contra, the learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and taking into account the materials available on record as also considering the period of incarceration of the petitioners herein, I deem it fit and proper to admit the petitioners to the privilege of bail. Accordingly, the abovenamed petitioners are directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court of Additional District & Sessions Judge II-cum-Special Judge (Excise), Sitamarhi in connection with Sonebarsa PS case no.10 of 2021. (Mohit Kumar Shah, J) rinkee/- U T