← Library
Patna High CourtCR. APP (SJ)/1345/2025withdrawn

Sanjeev Kumar Suman v. The State Of Bihar

2025-06-24Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1345 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-45 Year-2022 Thana- SC/ST District- Munger ====================================================== 1.

Sanjeev Kumar Suman Son of Late Kamla Kant Thakur Resident of Mohalla -Subhash Nagar, Ward no 13, Near Shiv Mandir Ps -Purnea and Dist- Purnea 2.

Santosh Kumar Suman @ Santosh Kumar son Late Kamla Kant Thakur Resident of Mohalla -Subhash Nagar, Ward no 12, Near Shiv Mandir Ps -Purnea and Dist- Purnea 3.

Meera Devi @ Meera Kumari Wife of Late Kamalkant Thakur R/o villageMunger, Katghar, Near Hanuman Mandir, Ward no. 11, P.S- Kotwali, DistMunger, P/A- Resident of Mohalla -Subhash Nagar, Ward no 13, Near Shiv Mandir Ps -Purnea and Dist- Purnea ... ... Appellant/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Sapna Devi Wife of Abhijeet Paswan Resident of Mohalla -Subhash Nagar, Gali No. 5, Ps- Kotwali, Dist- Munger ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s :

Mr.Rupesh Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Binay Krishna, Spl. P.P.

For respondent No.2 : Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 24-06-2025 Heard Mr.Rupesh Kumar, learned counsel for the appellants, Mr. Satish Kumar Sinha, learned counsel for respondent No.2 and Mr.Binay Krishna, learned Spl.P.P. for the State.

2. Mr.Binay Krishna, learned Spl.P.P. for the State has pointed out that the cognizance has been taken against the appellants in the present appeal, so the present appeal is not maintainable.

3. In view of the aforesaid, learned counsel for the

Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1345 of 2025(3) dt.24-06-2025 2/2 appellants seeks permission to withdraw this appeal.

4. Permission is accorded.

5. Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.

6. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that he has already assailed the cognizance order in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.1568 of 2025.

7. If the appellants succeed in Cr. Appeal (SJ) No.1568 of 2025, they may file a fresh appeal. (Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Nitesh/- U T