Patna High CourtMJC/1215/2014dismissed

Mohan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2016-03-16Mr. Justice Dr. Ravi Ranjan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1215 of 2014 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 24156 of 2013 ====================================================== Mohan Pawan Son Of Late Ramdeo Paswan R/O Mohalla Power House Road, Gachi Tola, Rajendra Nagar, Ward No. 32, P.O. And P.S, Begusarai, District Begusarai .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. Sri Manoj Kumar Srivastava, District Magistrate, Begusarai

3. Sri Kaushal Kishore, Deputy Development Commissioner Cum District Executive Officer Begusarai Zila Parishad Begusarai

4. Sri Ghanshyam Pd. Dabtwar, Special Work Officer, Panchayat Raj Department, Bihar Patna

5. Sri Arbind Kumar Singh, Deputy Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department Bihar, Patna

6. Srimati Indira Devi Chairman Zila Parishad Begusarai

7. . Sri Nawal Kishore , District Engineer, Zila Parishad, Begusarai .... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha No.3, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, GA 3 For the Zila Parishad : Mr. Nilesh Kumar, Advocate Begusarai ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 16-03-2016 Heard the parties.

It is contended on behalf of Zila Parishad, Begusarai that a decision dated 24.3.2014 vide Annexure E has been taken in compliance of the order of this Court passed in connected writ application which is rectified by the Board also vide Annexure F. Thereafter, the petitioner has been given additional amount for which he was entitled for having worked as driver of road roller

Patna High Court MJC No.1215 of 2014 (7) dt.16-03-2016 2/2 from 1993-99.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances, in my view this proceeding cannot continue further and is, accordingly, dropped.

However, petitioner would be at liberty to assail the orders contained in Annexure E and F passed by the authorities and also, if he is not satisfied with the payment made to him for the work done, before a competent forum.

(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) Spd/- U