Shatrudhan Paswan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.18723 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-4 Year-2020 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== SHATRUDHAN PASWAN Son of Rajdeo Paswan Resident of Village - Adampur, P.S.- Danapur, District - Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Satish Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Sanjay Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 03-06-2020 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in Danapur P.S. Case No. 4 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 353, 504, 506, 509 of the Indian Penal Code and sections 25(1-B)a, 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act. One loaded country made Katta is alleged to have been recovered from possession of this petitioner. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to local politics. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.18723 of 2020(2) dt.03-06-2020 2/2 petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2020 having clean antecedent.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000 (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Ist, Danapuar, Patna in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 4 of 2020 subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.
(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T