Ashish Yadav @ Ashish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21195 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-237 Year-2025 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== Ashish Yadav @ Ashish Kumar Son of Doro Yadav Resident of village - Kushmaha, P.S.- Bounsi, District - Banka.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar, APP For the Informant :
Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR VERMA ORAL ORDER 17-04-2026 Heard Mr. Brij Nandan Prasad, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Shashi Bhushan Singh, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Shailendra Kumar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 237 of 2025, F.I.R. dated 08.08.2025 for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 329(3), 76, 109(1), 303(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.
3. According to prosecution case, all the accused persons including this petitioner have assaulted to the son of the informant and also snatched his gold chain.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21195 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 2/3 petitioner is innocent and he has falsely been implicated in the present case. The allegation as alleged in the FIR is false and fabricated and the petitioner has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He further submits that the petitioner is named in the FIR but there is no specific allegation of assault or overt act attributed against the petitioner rather there is general and omnibus allegation against him.
5. The learned counsel for the informant as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner on the ground that petitioner carries two criminal antecedents other than the present one but fairly submits that he is on bail in both the pending matters.
6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M, Banka in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No. 237 of 2025, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure and with other following conditions:-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21195 of 2026(2) dt.17-04-2026 3/3 i. Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the court and on his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the Court below. ii. If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses, in that case, the prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail.
iii. And further condition that the court below shall verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and in case at any stage it is found that the petitioner has concealed his criminal antecedent, the court below shall take step for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner. However, the acceptance of bail bonds in terms of the above-mentioned order shall not be delayed for purpose of or in the name of verification.
(Rajesh Kumar Verma, J) Vanisha/- U T