Patna High CourtMJC/160/2015dismissed

Ram Vilas Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-09Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.160 of 2015 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 16708 of 2008 ====================================================== Ram Vilas Singh, son of Late Sitaram Singh, resident of village- ManjhaulII, P.O.- Manjhaul, P.S.- Cheriya Bariarpur, District- Begusarai, at present posted and working as an Assistant Teacher in Govt. Middle SchoolCheriya Bariarpur, Anchal- Cheriya Bariarpur, District- Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. R.K. Mahajan, Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. M.N. Prasad, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. Mr. Shashi Bhushan Pathak, Deputy Secretary, Finance (Pay Fixation) Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5. Mr. Sridhar Chirowly, Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

6. Mr. Binod Kuamr, Special Director, Primary and Adult Education, Bihar, patna.

7. Mr. Ranjit Narain Singh, Regional Deputy Director of Education, Munger Division, Munger.

8. Mr. Anil Kumar, District Superintendent of Education, Begusarai now District Programme Officer (Establishment), Begusarai.

9. Smt. Seema Tripathi, District Magistrate, Begusarai.

10. Mr. Kaushal Kishore Thakur, Deputy Development Commissioner-cumChairman, District Education Establishment Committee, Begusarai.

11. Mr. G. Shankar, District Treasury Officer, Begusarai.

12. Mr. Prithwi Raj Shrivastava, District Accounts Officer, Begusarai. .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. Parth Sharthi, G.A.-11 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER

Patna High Court MJC No.160 of 2015 (2) dt.09-02-2017 2/2 09-02-2017 A show-cause has been filed by the State, in which the statement has been made that the order of this Court has already been complied with.

In such view of the matter, there is no need to keep this matter pending. Accordingly, this contempt proceeding is dropped.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U