Md Alimuddin @Alumuddin v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21298 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-30 Year-2022 Thana- MAHILA P.S District- Supaul ====================================================== MD ALIMUDDIN @ALUMUDDIN SON OF MD MAJIT RESIDENT OF VILLAGE -HARICHAKLA, WARD NO 2 ,POLICE STATION KARJAIN, DISTT- SUPAUL ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

BIBI MEHRUN KHATOON WIFE OF MD. ALIMUDDIN @ ALUMUDDIN RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- KARJAIN, WARD NO. 09, PSKARJAIN, DISTT- SUPAUL ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-05-2023 Learned counsel for the petitioner is permitted to remove defect (s), as pointed out by the office, if any, within a period of four weeks on resumption of physical mode. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Supaul Mahila P.S. Case No. 30 of 2022 dated 02.06.2022 registered for the offences punishable u/s 498(A), 341, 323, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.

As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the coaccused persons are alleged to have tortured the informant due

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21298 of 2023(2) dt.22-05-2023 2/2 to non-fulfillment of demand of Rs. 2 lakh as dowry. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is the husband of the informant. He is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The petitioner neither demanded money nor tortured the informant. The petitioner has got clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 09.11.2022.

Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Supaul in connection with Supaul Mahila P.S. Case No. 30 of 2022.

The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Ajay Singh/- U T