Md. Sadare Alam @ Sadare Alam @ Md. Sadare v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24809 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-18 Year-2024 Thana- RAJNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== Md. Sadare Alam @ Sadare Alam @ Md. Sadare Son of Md. Maksud Resident of Village- Parsa, P.S.- Rajnagar, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratnakar Jha, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Anuj Kumar Shrivastava, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The Petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with G.R. No. 180 of 2024 arising out of Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 180 of 2024 dated 29.01.2024 registered a case for the offences punishable u/s 341, 323, 308, 354(A), 379, 427, 504, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, it is alleged that on 21.01.2024 at about 7:30 am, the petitioner along with one coaccused person came at the door of the informant and started abusing her. On protest, they assaulted the informant by an iron rod causing injuries to her head and on her lips. The petitioner tore her clothes and the co-accused Ishrat snatched her silver chain. The petitioner and the co-accused person also assaulted the son of the informant. The petitioner broke the box of the informant and took out Rs. 4500/-

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24809 of 2024(2) dt.25-04-2024 2/2 and some papers.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case due to enmity. There is general and omnibus allegations made against the petitioner. As per the annexure-P/2, the doctor has opined the injury suffered by the informant is simple in nature. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent as stated at para 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances and the injury is found simple in nature, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate-1s, Madhubani in connection with G.R. No. 180 of 2024 arising out of Rajnagar P.S. Case No. 18 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) annpurna/- U T