Patna High CourtCWJC/15436/2015disposed

Ahmad Ali v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2015-10-07Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15436 of 2015 ====================================================== Ahmad Ali, Son of Late Abdul Karim, Resident of Village- Paschimi Sareya, Khaira Tola, P.S.- Paharpur, District- East Champaran. Presently Chairman of Paschimi Sareya PACS, P.S. - Paharpur, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. The District Magistrate, East Champaran at Motihari.

3. The Secretary, Bihar State Food Corporation, Patna, Bihar.

4. The District Cooperative Officer, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

5. The District Manager, Bihar State Food Corporation, East Champaran at Motihari.

6. The B.C.E.O., Block Paharpur, District- East Champaran at Motihari.

7. M/s Om Udhyog, Laxmipur, Raghunathpur, District- East Champaran.

8. The L.R.D.C., Areraj Sub Division, District- East Champaran. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar No.-7 For the Respondent-State : Mr. Manish Kumar, GP-8 For the Respondent-SFC : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 07-10-2015 Learned counsel for the parties are present.

The petitioner complains against the non-lifting of paddy by the Corporation. Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, learned counsel appearing for the Corporation submits that the cut-off date for the purpose was 31.8.2015 and the petitioner has approached this Court much thereafter.

Mr. Singh with reference to the report of the District Magistrate relating to the cooperative societies situated within the district of East Champaran and submitted in CWJC No.11736 of 2015 submits that in so far as Paschimi Sareya

Patna High Court CWJC No.15436 of 2015 (2) dt.07-10-2015 Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society, of which the petitioner happens to be the Chairman is concerned, the stock position has been mentioned as 'NIL'.

In the circumstances no indulgence can be granted. The writ petition is disposed of.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U