Ayush Kumar Jha @ Ayush Kumar @ Ayush Jha v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20352 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-379 Year-2025 Thana- MAHNAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1.

Ayush Kumar Jha @ Ayush Kumar @ Ayush Jha S/o Late Munna Jha @ Ratnesh Kumar Jha Resident of Village- Shukkar Pethiya Mahnar Kharjamma, Ward No 03, Police Station- Mahnar, District- Vaishali 2.

Aditya Kumar @ Muskan Kumar Singh S/o Pintu Singh Resident of VillageShukkar Pethiya Mahnar Kharjamma, Ward No 03, Police Station- Mahnar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akash Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Suresh Prasad Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 07-05-2026 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioners are apprehending arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable in connection with Mahnar P.S. Case No.379 of 2025 under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023, which is pending before the court of CJM, Vaishali at Hajipur.

3. As per the prosecution, the FIR has been lodged against six named accused persons including the petitioners with allegation that the accused persons in connivance with each other attacked by sword and fursa on the informant due to which injury sustained and 10 stitches have been made on the head of the informant.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20352 of 2026(3) dt.07-05-2026 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. He submits that the only negative aspect with the petitioners is that their antecedent are not clean. There are three more cases pending against the petitioners in which they are on bail. He further submits that there is no specific allegation rather general and omnibus allegation made in the FIR.

5. Counsel also submits that case diary has been called for. In the case diary, injury is simple in nature.

6. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail and the case diary indicates that injury has been caused by sharp weapon, which caused 5cm ×0.5 cm wound on the forehead. He further submits that the petitioners' antecedent are not clean.

7. In the present facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, therefore the bail application of the petitioners is hereby rejected.

8. However, trial court is directed to consider the regular bail application of the petitioners, if they surrender and pray for regular bail, then trial court shall pass order on merit, without being prejudice of the present order. (Dr. Anshuman, J) Prakashmani/- U T