Ram Awadhesh Rajak @ Awadhesh Rajak v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.43365 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -30 Year- 2016 Thana -CHANDI District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Ram Awadhesh Rajak @ Awadhesh Rajak, Son of Bideshi Rajak, resident of Village- Jalpura Tapa, Police Station- Chandi, District- Bhojpur (Ara). .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Rita Verma, A.PP. For the Informant : Mr. Dhirendra Singh, Adv. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-03-2017 Heard learned counsel appearing for the respective parties.
In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Chandi P.S. Case No.30 of 2016, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
This Court vide order dated 24.10.2016 has granted provisional bail to the petitioner.
The nutshell allegation has been made against the petitioner that his son-Ranjeet Rajak has extended the offer to arrange a Government job in the consideration amount of Rs.3,50,000/-. In pursuance thereof, the informant has given Rs.1,40,000/- in cash and rest Rs.2,10,000/- has been deposited
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43365 of 2016 (7) dt.01-03-2017 2/2 in different accounts given by the son of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that Ranjeet Rajak against whom direct allegation has been made of taking money has been granted bail by this Court. Learned counsel for the informant submits that Ranjeet Rajak has given the Account Numbers wherein the informant has deposited the amount on different dates. He further submits that those persons in whose account the informant has deposited the amount have not been examined by the police. But the fact remains that Rs.25,000/- which the informant has deposited in the account of the son of the petitioner has been returned by him, which is apparently clear from the record of this case.
Looking to the facts and circumstances of the case, the provisional bail granted to the petitioner is hereby confirmed. However, the police are directed to examine the persons on whose accounts the money has been deposited by the petitioner. (Shivaji Pandey, J) pawan/- U