← Library
Patna High CourtMA/570/2013disposed

Smt. Babita Devi v. Sri Shiv Shankar Bharti

2015-02-10Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah,Mr. Justice V.N. Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Appeal No. 570 of 2013 =========================================================== Smt. Babita Devi Wife of Sri Shivshankar Bhartee resident of Village- Bhawanipur, P.S. Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur and daughter of Sri Janardan Poddar, resident of Village- Puraini Bazar, P.S. Chausa, District- Madhepura. .... .... Respondent/s / Appellant/s

Versus

Sri Shiv Shankar Bharti S/O Late Shukdeo Poddar resident of Village- Bhawanipur, P.S. Naugachia, District- Bhagalpur.

.... .... Appellant/s / Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellant/s : Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Radha Mohan Pathak & Mr. Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra, Advocates.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE V.N. SINHA) Date: 10-02-2015 Heard learned counsel for the appellant-wife and the counsel for the respondent-husband.

2. It appears that matrimonial case filed by the husband was earlier dismissed for default and the order dismissing the same on default was set aside by a Division Bench of this Court under order dated 08.08.2008 passed in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 85 of 2006 and original Matrimonial Case No. 27 of 2003 was restored to its original file and number. By the impugned order aforesaid matrimonial case has been allowed dissolving the marriage of the appellant with her husband ex parte as after 08.08.2008 before she could appear in the Court below the said matrimonial case was allowed under judgment dated 25.02.2012.

Patna High Court MA No.570 of 2013 dt.10-02-2015 2/2

3. With the consent of the parties, the appeal is heard and finally disposed off as we are of the view that opportunity of being heard has not been provided to the appellant-wife. In the circumstances, we set aside the judgment dated 25.02.2012 passed in Matrimonial Case No. 27 of 2003 with direction to both the appellant-wife and respondent-husband to appear in the Court below i.e., in the Court of Principal Judge, Family Court, Bhagalpur on 02.03.2015, whereafter the Principal Judge shall proceed with the matter by fixing a date in the matter permitting the wife not only to cross examine the husband as also the other witnesses produced on his behalf but also allow her to lead evidence. The proceeding must be conducted on day to day basis and concluded as early as possible in any case within three months from the date of their first appearance in light of this order.

(V.N. Sinha, J.) (Ahsanuddin Amanullah, J.) P. Kumar U