← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24424/2019disposed

Ramashish Baitha v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-29Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.24424 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-38 Year-2019 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Ramashish Baitha, Son of Late Ganesh Baitha, Resident of VillageJaisinghpur, Mishra Tola, Police Station- Sikta, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar No 7 For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 29-07-2019 This is an application for grant of anticipatory bail in connection with Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 38 of 2019, disclosing offences under Sections 420 & 409 of IPC. Allegation as per the F.I.R. lodged by the District Immunization Officer is that the petitioner has not entered the expenditure of Rs.2,52,282/- in the cash book and also defalcated Rs.28,257/- in cash. Further allegation is that he has also not produced the four cheques to the authority. Submission of learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has already deposited Rs.41,590/- in P.N.D.T. account and rest of the amount of Rs.2,52,282/- he has returned from the account of CMO to the Government account and the cheque has been returned to the bank and he has filed a supplementary affidavit showing all these things.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.24424 of 2019(5) dt.29-07-2019 2/2 Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on provisional bail till submission of the charge sheet with a direction to the petitioner to produce all the papers to the authority concerned and I.O. to examine the veracity of the submissions of learned counsel for the petitioner. However, even after examination of the above submissions and the documents, if it is found that still there is allegation against the petitioner and charge sheet has been submitted, the petitioner surrender before the learned court below and make prayer for regular bail, without being prejudiced by order of this Court. With the aforesaid observations, this application is disposed of.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sunil Shukla/- U T