Rajiv Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11812 of 2025 ====================================================== Rajiv Kumar Son of Late Rakesh Raushan @ Late Rakesh Kumar Raushan @ Late Kusheshwar Bind, Resident of Village- Bin Toli, Barahpur, Ward No.2, P.O Barahpur, District- Patna (Bihar).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary Government of Bihar Old Secretariat, Patna.
2.
Principle Secretary, Social Welfare Department Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
3.
District Magistrate, Patna.
4.
District Programme Officer, Patna.
5.
Child Development Project Officer, Mokama, Patna. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ajay Kr Singh No.1, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Government Pleader (06) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 18-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent-State.
2. With the consent of all the parties this writ application is being disposed of at this stage itself.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for the relief as claimed in the present writ application, the petitioner has already filed representation dated 15.04.2022 (Annexure-P/3) before the Child Development Project Officer, Mokama, Patna, (respondent No.5) and the same continues to be pending.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he would be satisfied if an appropriate direction is issued to the Child Development Project Officer, Mokama, Patna, (respondent No.5)
Patna High Court CWJC No.11812 of 2025(2) dt.18-08-2025 2/2 to dispose of the representation dated 15.04.2022 (Annexure-P/3) of the petitioner within a fixed time frame after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
5. To the above prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents-State do not have any objection.
6. Considering the limited nature of prayer being made by learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ application is disposed of directing the Child Development Project Officer, Mokama, Patna, (respondent No.5) to dispose of the representation of the petitioner dated 15.04.2022 (Annexure-P/3) after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of four months from the date of production of a copy of this order.
7. The final order which shall be passed by the Child Development Project Officer, Mokama, Patna, (respondent No.5) shall be reasoned and speaking order.
8. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the present writ application is disposed of.
9. The pending I.As., if any, shall be deemed to have been disposed of.
sanjeev/- (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) U