Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Mali v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19798 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2018 Thana- PHULWARIYA District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Suraj Kumar @ Suraj Mali, aged about 22 years (Male), S/o Laddan Mali R/o Mishir Batraha, P.S.- Fulwaria, District- Gopalganj. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Amit Kumar Rakesh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajeev Nayan (App231) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 366, 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Informant is father-in-law of the victim who has stated that petitioner has enticed away his daughter-in-law on 01.11.2018 at 3 p.m. and she went away with wealth of Rs.2,50,000/-.

It has been submitted that petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It has further been submitted that victim girl has returned to her matrimonial house. Petitioner is in custody since 03.01.2019.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19798 of 2019(2) dt.02-04-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Fulwaria P.S. Case No.258/2018, with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T