Ramen Yadav @ Ravin Kumar @ Ravin Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav @ Ramayan Yadav @ Reman Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.22281 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2022 Thana- MANSI District- Khagaria ====================================================== Ramen Yadav @ Ravin Kumar @ Ravin Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav @ Ramayan Yadav @ Reman Yadav S/O Ramashish Yadav R/O Village- Amani, P.S- Mansi, Distt.- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 23-06-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Mansi P.S Case No. 140 of 2022 dated 28.04.2022 registered for the offence punishable u/s 341, 323, 326, 307, 506 read with section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused persons along with three unknown miscreants holding lethal weapons were standing at Basa of Nepali Singh. On being asked, Aman Yadav, Ramen Yadav and Ranjeet Yadav started assaulting the informant and the co-
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22281 of 2025(2) dt.23-06-2025 2/3 accused Ranjeet Yadav caught hold of him and the petitioner Ramen Yadav @ Ravin Kumar @ Rabin Kumar Yadav @ Ramesh Yadav @ Ramayan Yadav fired on the stomach of the informant. Thereafter, the informant was taken to the Sadar Hospital for treatment.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is further submitted that during the course of the investigation, the allegation of firing is against one Ranjit Yadav and as such final form was submitted against the petitioner showing not sent up for trial. It is further submitted that in spite of submitting final form showing not sent up for trial, the cognizance has been taken against the petitioner. The petitioner has one criminal antecedent in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. Petitioner is in custody since 21.01.2025.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer of regular bail of the petitioner by submitting that there is specific allegation of firing against the petitioner. It is further submitted that earlier the bail petition of the petitioner has been rejected by this Court vide order dated 20.11.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 65445 of 2024.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.22281 of 2025(2) dt.23-06-2025 3/3
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate 1st , Khagaria in connection with Mansi P.S. Case No. 140 of 2022, subject to the following condition:-
(1) The petitioner is directed to remain physically present before the learned Court below on each and every date, failing which on two consecutive dates without reasonable cause, the bail bonds of the petitioner is liable to be cancelled.
7. This application stands allowed.
(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Sudhanshu/- U T