Ajeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.19565 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-21 Year-2019 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Patna ====================================================== Ajeet Kumar Son of Manoj Kumar @ Manoj Singh Resident of Village - Uphraul, Ufraul, P.S.- Bidupur, District - Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Praveen Kumar, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Madan Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN ORAL ORDER 27-09-2022 Let the defect(s), if any, be removed within two weeks from today.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Special (N.D.P.S) Case no. 151 of 2019 arising out of NCB/PZU/V P.S. Case No. 21 of 2019 lodged under Sections 8 (c) / 20 (b) (ii) (c) /29 of the N.D.P.S. Act. As per the prosecution case, the total recovery of 50 kg ganja alleged to be made from the vehicle of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is true that vehicle belongs to petitioner but his vehicle was used by one Saurav Kumar Gupta and he claimed that he is innocent.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.19565 of 2020(3) dt.27-09-2022 2/2 He further submits that charge sheet has been made as well as charge has also been framed. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he is in custody since 25.10.2019. His criminal antecedent is only one in which he is on bail which is due to family dispute.
Learned counsel for the State submits that the recovery of 50 kg ganja which is more than commercial quantity is there. Recovery has been made from the vehicle of the petitioner. This vehicle is private in nature therefore, entire responsibility goes to the petitioner about the use of the vehicle. In the present facts and circumstances of this case and the submissions made above, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.
With this observation, the bail application stands rejected.
(Dr. Anshuman, J.) prakashmani/- U T